Primeros reviews del Core i9 9900K - Con muchos problemas

Más
7 años 3 meses antes - 7 años 3 meses antes #1 por Tamalero
El nuevo "rey" para juegos de acuerdo con intel ha finalmente recibido el trato que se merece con reviews de la población general y no "pre-pagada".

Los resultados son algo de sorpresa considerando lo diferente de como se espera.

Para hacer un resumen rápido...
En muchos juegos el 9900k es mas lento que el 8700k (8 cores vs 6 cores) por la diferencia del boost.
En otros juegos el 9900k es mas rapido, aunque la diferencia entre el 8700k y Ryzen 2700X con el 9900k no es tan grande como lo inflaban en los reviews pagados.
El 9900k es HORRIBLEMENTE ineficiente tanto en temperaturas como en consumo energético.. llegando en mucho reviews a 115 celsius en ventiladores y heatsinks premium como Noctua.
En otros tests consumiendo mas energía que los Threadripper de AMD.
Lo peor? el costo.. puedes comprar casi 2 sistemas de AMD por el precio de UN SOLO corei9900k.


Los reviews:

www.anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-i5-9600k-review
There’s no way around it, in almost every scenario it was either top or within variance of being the best processor in every test (except Ashes at 4K). Intel has built the world’s best gaming processor (again).

On our CPU tests, the i9-9900K hit a lot of the synthetics higher than any other mainstream processor. In some of our real world tests, such as application loading or web performance, it lost out from time to time to the i7 and i5 due to having hyper-threading, as those tests tend to prefer threads that have access to the full core resources. For memory limited tests, the high-end desktop platforms provide a better alternative.

While there’s no specific innovation in the processors driving the performance, Intel re-checked the box for STIM, last used on the mainstream in Sandy Bridge. The STIM implementation has enabled Intel to push the frequency of these parts. It was always one of the tools the company had in its back pocket, and many will speculate as to the reasons why it used that tool at this point in time.

But overall, due to the frequency push and the core push, the three new 9th Generation processors sit at the top of most of our mixed workload tests, given the high natural frequency, and set a new standard in Intel’s portfolio for being a jack of all trades. If a user has a variable workload, and wants to squeeze performance, then these new processors will should get you there.

So now, if you are the money-no-object kind of gamer, this is the processor for you. But it’s not a processor for everyone, and that comes down to cost and competition.

At $488 MSRP, plus add $80-$120 for a decent cooler or $200 for a custom loop, it’s going to be out of the range for almost all builds south of $1500 where GPU matters the most. When Intel’s own i5-9600K is under half the cost with only two fewer cores, or AMD’s R7 2700X is very competitive in almost every test, while they might not be the best, they’re more cost-effective.

The outlandish flash of the cash goes on the Core i9-9900K. The smart money ends up on the 9700K, 9600K, or the 2700X. For the select few, money is no object. For the rest of us, especially when gaming at 1440p and higher settings where the GPU is the bigger bottleneck, there are plenty of processors that do just fine, and are a bit lighter on the power bill in the process.


www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-9900k-9th-gen-cpu,5847.html

Core i9-9900K takes the crown as the fastest gaming processor on the market, and it proves to be highly capable in the threaded workloads that AMD's Ryzen processors used to dominate. Pricing is still a problem for Intel, though. You pay dearly for the extra cores, while a majority of games don't fully utilize them. The Core i7-9700K, even at stock settings, is competitive with the -9900K in most titles, especially considering the $115 you save by stepping down a notch. We haven't overclocked our -9700K yet, though, so the small deltas observed between the two chips may shrink further.

Although AMD's second-gen Ryzen processors narrowed the gap with Intel's Coffee Lake-based line-up, these ninth-generation Core chips redefine the playing field. The $263 Core i5-9600K at stock settings regularly beat an overclocked $378 Ryzen 7 2700X in games, and we expect even more performance from the Core i5 once we overclock it. Ryzen 7 2700X does come with a capable cooler, but the Core i5’s lower price diminishes AMD’s value proposition.

In the end, Core i9-9900K serves up impressive performance across our benchmark suite. If you regularly run heavily-threaded applications, it's probably worth paying a premium for. But if you need real workstation-class features, you should step up to an appropriate platform.

And make no mistake, the Core i9-9900K requires expensive accommodations. You need a premium motherboard with robust power delivery, particularly if you plan on overclocking. The -9900K can drop into existing Z370 motherboards, but we’re sure that many of them will struggle with the chip’s voracious appetite for current. Also plan on investing in a high-end PSU.

The -9900K proved to be an impressive overclocker, largely due to its Solder TIM. Don't think that means you can skimp on cooling, though. High temperatures hampered our overclocking efforts, and a more capable cooler could have facilitated additional headroom. Intel even threw in new packaging to help win back the hearts and minds of enthusiasts.

Now the question is whether Intel can satisfy enthusiast demand. After all, we've already heard reports of delayed pre-order shipments. Even though the company assures us that it can accommodate demand for eight-core CPUs, this doesn't bode well for availability as the company grapples with an ongoing shortage of 14nm manufacturing capacity.

The Core i9-9900K has no direct rival on a mainstream platform, but its high price point encroaches into the realm of AMD’s upcoming $649 12-core Threadripper 2920X (which has hefty platform requirements of its own). That chip isn't available yet, so its performance remains shrouded in mystery. For something more readily available, look to the previous-gen Threadripper 1920X.

Unless you regularly use heavily-threaded applications, it’s hard to justify stepping up to Core i9-9900K from any modern four- or six-core CPU. With that said, Core i9-9900K is the fastest mainstream processor on the market. Plenty of enthusiasts opt for the best possible performance in both single- and multi-threaded workloads at any price. There, the Core i9-9900K doesn’t disappoint.



Tech Jesus habla también de como intel tuvo que eliminar su pasta termal chafa por soldadura de indium para su Corei 9900k.




Los problemillas...



El horrible consumo energético también.. y con menos cores..



Última Edición: 7 años 3 meses antes por Tamalero.

Por favor, Conectar o Crear cuenta para unirse a la conversación.

Más
7 años 3 meses antes #2 por Tamalero
Respuesta de Tamalero sobre el tema Primeros reviews del Core i9 9900K - Con muchos problemas
Otro review que platican del buen desempeño, pero las horribles temperaturas.


Por favor, Conectar o Crear cuenta para unirse a la conversación.

Más
7 años 3 meses antes #3 por Tamalero
Respuesta de Tamalero sobre el tema Primeros reviews del Core i9 9900K - Con muchos problemas
Tech Jesus hace una revision sobre el consumo de poder, frecuencias y variabilidad del Core i9900K.
Resulta que intel viola sus propias leyes de TDP y Turbo..



El resumen? parece que el 9900K en realidad tiene un TDP de 150W y no 95W como lo dicen.
Ya que el throttling que hace es severo y constantemente baja el voltaje y frecuencias de manera importante.. bajando el desempeño.

Por favor, Conectar o Crear cuenta para unirse a la conversación.

Más
7 años 3 meses antes - 7 años 3 meses antes #4 por Tamalero
Respuesta de Tamalero sobre el tema Primeros reviews del Core i9 9900K - Con muchos problemas
Un interesante test en donde se prueba el procesador intel en su limite oficial de 95W.
Dando una caida en promedio de 14% de desempeño y casi el mismo nivel que el 2700X en la mayoría de los tests.

No sorprende porque a intel le encanta que las tarjetas madres que los reviewers usan, se salgan enormemente del limite de las especificaciones.

The short version of this is that motherboard makers are currently getting blamed for running the 9900K out of spec, when in reality we strongly believe it’s Intel who’s cheating their own spec and pushing board partners to run the 9900K at the default clock multiplier table, rather than at the official power spec.

Whatever the case, out of the box the 9900K isn’t running at the Intel spec, it’s essentially overclocked and this has caused power and thermal results to go through the roof. So in today’s re-test we'll be showing how the Core i9-9900K performs when adhering to the Intel specification and comparing that data to the current out of the box experience.


www.techspot.com/review/1744-core-i9-9900k-round-two/



Y lo mas horrible de todo...
el consumo..



En modo unleashed con máximo desempeño sin ningún limite.. el 9900k de 8 cores consume mas que un threadripper 2950X de 16 cores.
Última Edición: 7 años 3 meses antes por Tamalero.

Por favor, Conectar o Crear cuenta para unirse a la conversación.

Tiempo de carga de la página: 0.353 segundos
Powered by Foro Kunena